Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Posts Tagged ‘philosophy’

Maldini was one of my favourite players and the above quote from him is one of my favourite football-related quotes. I love watching and learning from people who are masters of their craft and see the true essence of their job*

Introduction

As a 13-year old playing as a forward (‘number 9’) for a prominent football team in Leicester (Highfield Rangers) – and at a cross-roads in my (potential) football career, I was (wrongly) diagnosed with meniscitis and told to stay away from any intense sports for ~6 months. As football was my only passion at the time, I couldn’t resist a kick-about with my school mates and ended up damaging my knee even further. I would have very intense pain for days after every game. I went to another doctor for help and he diagnosed me with Osgood-Schlatters disease, which is a common cause of knee pain in growing adolescents who do intense sports. It’s certainly not as bad as meniscitis and many players who reached the top like Steven Gerard and Paul Scholes have it. So, if I was diagnosed correctly at the time, I could have got away with a couple of weeks’ rest and regular ice pack treatment until my growth spurt ended – which I probably would have obliged. So (i) the wrong diagnosis, (ii) my inability to withstand my desire to play football, and (iii) not having someone to guide me in my early football career gave me the worst possible start. Before the injury, I was the top goalscorer of the U15 team – mostly thanks to being very fast** and having a very good technique – even though I was one of the youngest and shortest at the time (I’d like to also think I was quite intelligent for my age too). Pains me to say this but, living in Germany now – where even teams in the Kreisliga (like Division 10 in the UK) have access to good resources, I can also better see that the UK or a city like Leicester was not the best place for a young player like me (see the three points in bold above). Maybe if I was in Germany, I would have been better treated and educated, and could have made a fresh start.

After the intense pain (mostly) went away in a year or so time, I started to play in football tournaments every now and then, and won a few prestigious cups (incl. local 5-a-side Goals tournaments) but always felt that I (even as a 15 year old) was now too late for professional football in the UK, so decided to concentrate on my studies – which I have no regrets over. What I do regret is that (our peak physical) life is too short to fully commit to different careers – if having a football career was an option now (i.e. as a 34 year old now, I would still be at my peak physical condition for the next 10-15 years let’s say), I definitely would have given it a go just to see how far I could go. I did have a successful Leicester Sunday League (2007-10) and University of Bristol Staff League (2012-16) career though 😊

Anyway, after a slightly longer introduction than anticipated, let’s move straight to some things I picked up from my experiences but also others’:

General advice

  • Thinking about being a player you would hate to play against is a good start to set up the foundations for development. The most annoying oppositions for me were physically strong ones that never gave up – even after 3-0 down
  • Technical talent is overrated. ‘Hard work’ definitely beats ‘talent’ if talent doesn’t work hard (attributed to Tim Notke – a basketball coach). When talented people work hard and continuously improve themselves, then they become unstoppable – Ronaldo and Messi being perfect examples
  • Being available is the most underrated skill***. Keeping fit and ready (even if when not first pick) throughout the season is the reason why some ‘not-so-skilled’ players have had very successful and long careers at the top. I used to also think that the Golden Boot being awarded to a player who scored 1-2 extra goals than the 2nd player who played 10 games less was unfair but I now fully support it – same with the Golden Boot being shared although one player played many more games
  • Learn from the wins as well as the losses – analyse what went well also, not just what went wrong
  • Ask your coach and friends what you can improve on – this will be an eye opener, even if you don’t agree with them
  • Study yourself first and then study the best similar-styled players. Read autobiographies of these players and analysis books (e.g. do you know what POMO is?), listen to podcasts (e.g. The Athletic, Football Ramble), and watch analysis channels such as Sky Sports Football (and related channels e.g. The Overlap) and Tifo Football. Making a Football Manager-style summary card for yourself could help (Advanced: once you’ve honed your strengths and worked on your own weaknesses, study your likely opponents and learn to exploit their (potential) weaknesses e.g. if a defender or a goalkeeper is known to be eccentric – as a striker applying pressure, you know they might try to not just hoof the ball up the field every time but fake a kick and try to get past you at some point. Be prepared to nick the ball off them when that opportunity comes)
  • Best players are not right or left-sided, they use either foot almost as good
  • Have short and long term plans – and when an opportunity comes, see whether it fits with those plans. If you’re not on track to achieve those goals, talk to manager and experienced mates to get their advice
  • Do whatever gives you an extra boost pre-game – whether that’s listening to a certain type of music and/or praying – as most games are decided on small details (even many of those that finished 3-0)
  • Think of ways to become (one of) the coach’s and fan’s favourite. This will ensure that you’re playing and give you another chance to shine – this is what each game is! For the coach, showing that you’re listening and trying to keep to his tactics is key. For the fans, having tidy hair, clapping after the game and/or chatting with them after the game will go a long way. Using social media wisely is also important once you start accumulating follower – get at least one person to have a look before posting something
  • Playing for the national youth teams of smaller footballing nations is a great way to make a name for yourself – without committing to them for the rest of your career. So if you have citizenship and/or ancestry from these nations, contact their coaches and maybe you’ll get a call up even if you’re not playing in a top (youth) team. For example, a friend of mine had Antiguan ancestry and played for the Antigua and Barbuda National Team at a young age – and even played against the USA
  • Try to find yourself an English-speaking agent from a young age – to help with your visibility when you’re ready to make the jump

Advice to forward players

  • Number one priority for a striker is to score and directly assist goals. Getting involved in team play, winning headers, pressing defenders, defending corners etc. are all secondary and should not hinder your first priority. Only add these to your game once you’ve mastered your main job. Haaland is a perfect example of this – he can definitely improve on the other aspects but as long as he’s scoring at his current rate, no one will mind.
  • Best strikerslead the line‘ (e.g. Ronaldo, Rooney, Drogba, Ibrahimovic, Lewandowski, Shearer, Benzema****), therefore you must be strong physically and mentally but also have a leader mindset. If you’re not a natural leader, then take courses and/or read books to become one. You are the most important player in the team and therefore must be able to handle the responsibilities and the accompanying pressure
  • Football is a team sport, thus learn to work with your team mates to make space for yourself. There’s a reason why Ronaldo and Messi consistently scored a large number of goals every year: not only are they masters on the ball but off it too (e.g. if teams blindly concentrated on stopping Messi, then Suarez or Neymar would have also destroyed them. Messi utilised Suarez and Neymar’s runs to consistently make space for himself and score). It’s also OK not to score in a game if you played ‘well’ (e.g. directly contributed to the team’s win by assisting a goal) and the team won.
  • Best strikers make it look easy and usually score with their first touch where possible (max 1-2 touches before finishing). If you find yourself doing a lot of work before scoring, then reanalyse what could be made efficient. Especially work on first time finishes (of all sorts e.g. whipped, floated and slow crosses, penalties, volleys, tap-ins, headers – utilising both feet) – as defenders and/or keepers have a much increased chance of closing the angle or blocking a shot with every passing millisecond
  • As a striker, you must have a thick skin and be oblivious to abuse from (cunning/dirty) defenders and the opposition supporters. I was elbowed by a defender once and the referee didn’t see it. I got so angry and wanted to punch the guy but – even in the heat of the moment I was calm enough to realise that – if I did, he would have got exactly what he wanted. I told the referee about it to make him aware and carried on with my game
  • Learn to quickly forget any missed chances and not letting your head down. You will have plenty of chances to rectify any misses – if not this game, then the next. Learning to miss and forget is so important that I would recommend actually training for this. Do some ‘missing sessions’ (e.g. hit the ball nicely but deliberately miss a chance in training) and simulate how you would react. Even the greatest strikers miss gilt-edged chances but they usually do so in a cool way e.g. they hit the ball sweetly over the bar – not scuff it 😊
  • Learn how to slow down games when time is on your side e.g. you’re 2-0 up after 80 minutes. I do not mean time wasting by faking an injury but running to the channels when you have the chance and keeping the ball as further away from your goal as possible. Also, keep your head up and see if other team mates are running with you – if yes, pass to them, if not, try to win a throw-in or corner by hitting the ball to the opposition. If you don’t have the chance to run, always put your body between the ball and defender so they have no choice but to foul you or let you keep control of the ball – which will give you the chance to pass or make a run yourself. The main aim is to win and anything that puts this at risk should be avoided (see France v Bulgaria 1993 for a famous example). Only if the game is surely dead (e.g. 3-0 with five minutes to go) or it’s not an important game, then you can go for ‘stat padding’ – otherwise slow the game down
  • Being unpredictable will make you unstoppable. This is why being able to shoot from distance and/or chipping over a keeper, using both feet and head, coordinating with team mates to make dummy runs etc. will make you a nightmare for defenders
  • Many goals are wasted because a striker can’t keep with the offside line before the ball is played. Speeding up horizontally before making a sprint towards the goal has to come naturally. As this also requires coordination with your team mates, they should recognise your run/’signal’ before they attempt the pass – and vice versa. Work on this until you get it right – also Google ‘Beating the offside trap’ and you will find many nice examples (Google everything!)
  • In line with the point above regarding exploiting your opponent’s (potential) weaknesses, if you observe that a defender is prone to reckless sliding, there will be an opportunity to win an easy penalty as some point. I have seen Aguero and many other master strikers do this: As you’re about to shoot, if the defender slides from the slide to block you, you can use your feet to shield the ball and – although potentially painful – he will slide through you and knock you down. To find identify opportunities such as these, if possible, watch a game your direct rival defender has played poorly in

I hope these were useful. Please provide feedback as I would like to improve this post – I’m also happy to elaborate any point made here.

Thanks for reading!

Footnotes

*Another quote I love – I believe by Sir Bobby Robson, the legendary English manager – that I have heard years ago but haven’t been able to validate is (something like): “When the fans want you out, the board will stick by you. When the fans want the board out, get ready to pack your stuff

**Got a gold certificate at school for running 100m in ~12.0 seconds

***Giroud is a great example for this. He’s the all-time top goalscorer of the (Men’s) France National Team

****Deliberately kept the list long to show the different types of successful strikers

Read Full Post »

Many of today’s scientists (incl. myself a lot of the time) have probably lost touch with some of the central tenets of being a scientist – instead titles, number of published papers and grant money brought in becoming more important than the societal impact of their publications and how much they contributed to human knowledge. A shoddy paper published in Nature/Science/Cell (especially if cited/talked about a lot) carries far more weight than a solid paper in a less glamorous journal. An academic who brings in grant money – doesn’t matter if he/she wastes it on shoddy or average research – is far more important (i.e. they will be promoted and bring in further funding easier as they already brought in some before) than one who chooses to concentrate on producing solid research but struggles to bring in money e.g. due to a lack of funding in their specific field or publishing papers in non-glamorous journals due to ‘non-exciting’ results as they didn’t add a spin to their conclusions (click here for other examples). Some of the papers published in prestigious journals in my field would not have been accepted if the senior authors of the same papers were the reviewers – many seem to apply a less stringent criteria to their own papers. The relationship between editors and some senior scientists is also opaque which is ultimately damaging to science. Image source: naturalphilosophy.org

Hell for academics and researchers (NB: The list is loosely ordered and is not an exhaustive one). Of course, inspired by Dante’s Nine levels/layers/circles of Hell

A few months ago, I spent almost a week trying to replicate a published “causal” association which had received >500 citations in the last 5 years. My aim was to provide a better effect estimate and to do this, I used two different datasets, one with similar and another with a larger sample size. However, both of my analyses returned null results (i.e. no effect of exposure on outcome). Positive controls were carried out to make sure the analysis pipeline was working correctly. Ultimately, I moved on to other ‘more interesting’ projects as there was no point spending time writing a paper that was probably going to end up in a ‘not-so-prestigious’ journal and never going to get >500 citations or be weighted heavily when I apply for grants/fellowships.

Consequently, inadvertently I contributed to publication bias on this issue – and no other analyses on the subject matter were published since the original publication, so I am sure others have found similar results and chose not to publish.

State of academia (very generally speaking): Really talented and successful people working like slaves for unimportant academic titles and average salaries. What’s worse is that the job market is so fierce that most are perfectly happy(!) to just get on with their ‘jobs and do what they’ve always been doing (Note: this is my first attempt at drawing using Paint 🙂 )

However, I have changed my mind about publishing null/negative results after encountering Russell, Wittgenstein and others’ long debates on proving ‘negative’ truths/facts (and in a nutshell, how hard it is to prove negatives – which should make it especially important to publish conclusive null findings). These giants of philosophy thought it was an important issue and spent years structuring their ideas but here I am, not seeing my conclusive null results worthy of publication. I (and the others who found similar results) should have at least published a preprint to right a wrong – and this sentiment doesn’t just apply to the scientific literature. I also think academics should spend some time on social media to issue corrections to common misconceptions in the general public.

This also got me thinking about my university education: I was not taught any philosophy other than bioethics during my undergraduate course in biological sciences (specialising in Genetics in the final year). I am now more convinced than ever that ‘relevant’ philosophy (e.g. importance of publishing all results, taking a step back and revisiting what ‘knowledge’ is and how to attain ‘truth’, how to construct an argument1, critical thinking/logical fallacies, what is an academic’s intellectual responsibility?) should be embedded and mandatory in all ‘natural science’ courses. This way, I believe future scientists and journal editors would appreciate the importance of publishing negative/null results more and allow well-done experiments to be published in ‘prestigious’ journals more. This way, hopefully, less published research findings are going to be false2.

References/Further reading:

  1. Think Again I: How to Understand Arguments (Coursera MOOC)
  2. Ioannidis JPA. Why Most Published Research Findings Are False. PLoS Med. 2(8): e124 (2015)
  3. How Life Sciences Actually Work: Findings of a Year-Long Investigation (Blog post)
  4. An interesting Quora discussion: Why do some intelligent people lose all interest in academia?
  5. Calculating the ‘worth’ of an academic (Blog post)
A gross generalisation but unfortunately there is some truth behind this table – and it’s not even a comprehensive list (e.g. gatekeepers, cherry picking of results). Incentives need to change asap – and more idealists are needed in academic circles!

*the title comes from the fact that today’s natural scientists would have been called ‘natural philosophers’ back in the day

Read Full Post »

Please be aware of the fallacies you commit when constructing an argument – and likewise spot them when the opposition is using them against you. Constructing a completely valid argument is one of the hardest things and therefore requires sincerity, practice and knowledge. The former reason is important as committing fallacies can be an easy ‘exit strategy’ from a debate – and can win you the argument in the eyes of an uninformed/uneducated audience.

For those of you looking for real-life examples of the fallacies below, I’m sure you can observe them very frequently in political debates – and therefore can improve your ‘valid’ debating skills by not emulating them.

There is a Coursera course on How to Reason and Argue. Also see this link.

Examples of fallacies used in arguments

NB: I have always been against ‘useless’ debates (e.g. Science v Religion, Islam v Christianity) and more in favour of dialogue. However I do recognise that debates are sometime a must for human intellect to evolve, especially in natural and social sciences.

PS: There are also other biases which we probably all have – and all need to be rectified before we can reach our full potential as ‘open-minded’ human beings. See below:

Biases which affect our decisions in a negative way

Biases which affect our decisions in a negative way

Read Full Post »

Our eyes have been blurred with distractions
Our eyes have become blurred with distractions. We lost touch with the realities of this life.
Note: Scroll down for the English version of this post

Hayatın anlamını araştıran/sorgulayanların çoğu zaman, dinleri ve Allah’ı tamamen yalanlayanlardan olmasını anlamıyorum; gerçekten anlamıyorum!

Soylemeliyim ki hiçbir zaman bulamayacaksınız; egonuzu (nefsinizi) yenip/dizginleyip, Hakk’ın (c.c.) önünde eğilmediginiz surece! Biraz sert bir cevap gibi gelebilir ama gerçek bu. Samimiyetle O(c.c.)’nu bulmak istersek, ben Allah’ın bize ‘doğru yol’u gosterecegine inanıyorum. Buna siz de inanın!

Shakespeare, Tolstoy, Dostoyevsky, Dickens, Orwell’i okumak/anlamak için harcadıgımız zamanın onda birini Allah’ı (şimdilik varlıgına inanın ya da inanmayın) tanımaya/anlamaya harcasak da ondan sonra kararımızı versek.

Bir köpek dahi sahibini tanıyorsa, insan kendisini yaratandan geleni hayli hayli tanır. Kendi tecrübemden konuşuyorum. Kuran’a bakın; ve size (herkesinki farklı) tesir edecek öyle ayetler karşınıza çıkacak ki “işte bu kitap beni Yaratan’dan gelmiş!” dedirtecek!


Ek: İşe nasıl bir mucize ve ne kadar önemli birisi oldugunu tefekkür ederek başlayabilirsin. Ben de (beni etkileyen) bir örnekle yardımcı olmaya çalışayım: Mesela senin gibi bir insan dünya tarihinde olmadı; olmayacak! Eşsiz bir insansın! Allah seni (evet sadece seni!) yaratmak için annenle babanı tanıştırdı ve kalplerini birbirlerine ısıttı. Annenin 300 küsür yumurtasının arasında, babanın da milyarlarca spermi arasında seni yaratacak kombinasyonu seçti. Aynı şey, anne-baban ve dede-ninelerin için de gecerli… Onların anne-babası için de… Onlardan önceki nesiller içinde… Bu halkada bir tane eksik veya degişim olsaydı, sen olmayacaktın!

Ek 2: Arzu ederseniz ‘Evrim teorisi‘ (ingilizce) ve ‘hayat gayem‘le ilgili yazdıgım eski yazılarıma da göz gezdirebilirsiniz…

rumi_mevlana

People who’ve asked me “what is the meaning of life?” had one thing in common: Outright denial of all religions and (any idea of a) God

This is what I can’t understand; I really can’t!

Most of the time, any answer I gave would be thrown back at me with distaste. Sorry but – as a friend whose willing to help you – I’ll tell you what I believe and try backing them up with as much evidence (which convinces me) as possible, but it is up to you to be convinced or not. I don’t have the power to tune anybody’s heart or mind…

For me: Without religion, there’s no* meaning to life! Otherwise life just becomes: “You live because you were born; you had no choice!”

“Life was just an accident and your sperm happens to be the (un)lucky one out of the zillions that your father produced – also the same applies to your father; and his father… You just have to put up with it.”

Having no sense of meaning in life is why many people who have no belief in God and the afterlife commit suicide or waste their life (e.g. drugs, night life, gambling, games); and the one’s who don’t, live in constant fear of death – especially when they get older…

There can only be one “true” religion in the world – others will have no, some or a lot of truth in it but can’t be the “true religion”; and everybody has to make it their primary aim to find it! We spend hours reading Orwell, Shakespeare, Tolstoy, Dostoevsky’s works (rightly so! they can teach us a lot) but rarely do we look at the books which have (trying to word it as an objective person) “supposedly” been sent to us by God himself. Why aren’t we curious about them? How many of them have we read?

The true religion has to answer all reasonable philosophical questions which come to mind, whilst not contradicting scientific and historical facts… Also this doesn’t mean that we must “like” the answers that are given. Truth almost always hurts.

I believe I’ve found it and it has stood the test of time, however what convinces me may not convince you/others. Therefore everyone’s on their own conquest to find the truth and the true religion – the thing that will give our lives a meaning.

Please see my post God of Science for a few arguments on the existence of God (and the wrong belief that current scientific knowledge in genetics is incompatible with God). Happy to discuss any points…

*Read Albert Camus and other ‘existentialist’ philosophers (e.g. Sartre, Nietzsche) if you don’t believe me – they were atheists and believed that life had no meaning, so try(!) enjoying it while lasts…

Rumi-Quote-Ways-to-Jannah
There are as many ways to Paradise as there are human souls – Rumi

PS: There is a school of thought which believes that we’re made up of life, soul and body. Thus as long as we’re alive, the soul is tied to the body (via life). This can explain why we become unconscious (and ‘blackout’) when we faint. However when we die, we will not be unconscious as the ‘tie’ that is life (as we understand it) does not exist anymore. Thus the soul is free to travel (and get rid of the shackles/limitations of the body) and meet the Creator. Please read around the idea if interested. Happy to discuss…

PPS: I respect everyone’s beliefs – and lack of it. It is their own life choice at the end of the day! However it would selfish of me not to share/propagate something that I believe is to be true (i.e. belief in the existence of an omniscient and omnipotent God).

Read Full Post »